Showing posts with label Archdiocese. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Archdiocese. Show all posts

4 March 2010

Part One of A Brief History of the Toronto Catholic Diocese Chapter 1: A Parish in Crisis.

Previous

Part one.

The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun.
Is there any thing whereof it may be said, See, this is new? it hath been already of old time, which was before us. - Ecclesiastes 1:9-10

Gather round, my friends, for in this chapter I have a story to tell. It is a fascinating story and it will begin in earnest momentarily with the phrase ‘there was a knock at the door.’

The phrase ‘there was a knock at the door’ is a very useful and versatile phrase for storytellers, which is why it is so often appears in mystery stories, or horror, or even romance stories. It is an effective device to get the plot moving or to introduce the plot twist. You simply open the door and it walks through. In this case, the door will open to a world of a priest caught up in a social justice movement; Catholics divided along ethnic and language lines; a parish desperately divided between its popular priest, with his questionable theology, and the laws of Rome; hints of improper relations with women; an ostensibly Catholic newspaper that published anything but the Church’s true stance; and ultimately, a priest who ultimately is forced from the priesthood and a church placed under interdict. Where did all this happen? you ask. Why, right here in Toronto, at St Paul’s church.

Not this St Paul’s.



This one.


That’s right, our little story does not take place in the days following Vatican II as you might have guessed from my little description, but rather back before the days of Vatican I. Let us cast our minds back in time to time of the beginning of our story, in 1828, before Toronto was even a diocese, Before Toronto was even Toronto but still muddy old York, when the bishop was in Kingston, and there was but one parish in the city, and its church had just been finished. Now it’s time to start meeting the characters of our story.

First, let’s meet Angus MacDonnell, nephew of the bishop seated in Kingston, Alexander MacDonnell; first person born in Upper Canada to be ordained a priest; Pastor of St Paul’s in York, and poster boy for the society of the overworked, underpaid and unappreciated. On this evening in June of 1828 we find him hard at work in his pastoral office. “Hard at work” is a phrase that very much defines father MacDonnell. At this time, St Paul’s is the only parish in the village. It is, in fact, the only parish between Kingston and Windsor- at that time referred to as “Sandwich”. In addition to St Paul’s, our Father MacDonnell must also handle the mission churches that dot the surrounding countryside. By “surrounding countryside” I mean a geographical area roughly the size of Wales. He has many concerns weighing upon his young mind. Among them, he is in danger of losing the Catholics in the outlying regions of his parish to Protestant missionaries, because the Church has little presence out there. But it isn’t only the distant Catholics out there who are causing him so much concern. His parishioners close to home are also causing him many problems.

The problems with his parishioners at St Paul’s stem from the politics of the day. During the 1820’s and 30’s, there were a great number of civic disturbances- riots, by another name-  focused around political issues. The society at the time was split along lines of ethnicity and wealth. At the time the colony was ruled by an appointed governor. There was an elected assembly, but the governor was not bound to consult with them, or to ratify any bills they passed. Instead, the governor could and did choose his own counselors. These counselors almost always came from a small group of wealthy and privileged families, who became known as the family compact. Against them stood a groupd who called themselves reformers, who wanted, well, reform.  The politics of the day mainly consisted of reformers who wanted a more American style of government, who wanted the Assembly to be the ruling body of the government, and the Tories, who wanted nothing to do with American politics and desired the system to remain as it was.  There was a third group which stood balanced between the two, called the Moderates.  They wished for reform, but preferred to seek it piecemeal, within the system.  They are rarely mentioned in the hisotries, and are pretty much irrelevant for most of this story as well, save for a brief mention at the end.  As the decades progressed, the clashes between the Tories and the Reformers  grew more violent, leading ultimately to rebellion in 1837.

The rumblings of rebellion echoed even at St. Paul’s. Bishop MacDonnell was a Tory of Scottish origin, and even a member of the family compact following his appointment to the Legislative council in 1831. Angus, like his uncle, was also Scottish Tory. There were a few wealthy Tories within St. Paul’s church, but they were definitely in the minority. The majority of MacDonnell’s parishioners were lower class Irish who sided with the Reform movement, and many did not trust the Scottish patrician priest. So, to say MacDonnell is both overworked and under stress is a little like saying Leonardo da Vinci was a smart cookie.

The reason we are meeting Father MacDonnell (who, not so incidentally, will be leaving our little narrative shortly) here, on this evening in June of the Year of Our Lord 1828, is because a prayer of his is about to be answered. For it is on this evening, while he was hard at work in his room, that there was a knock on the door.

Father MacDonnell rose from his seat to answer the door, and into his room and our little story stepped a priest who identified himself as William John O’Grady, and who promptly asked Father MacDonnell if he needed any help.

At first MacDonnell was a trifle suspicious. The Church at that time was having a great amount of difficulty controlling the mission areas- and York was a mission. One part of the problem was that sparseness of the population, coupled with the itinerant nature of many priests, coupled with the inventive nature confidence men have displayed throughout all of history. A regular parish priest at that time was a great rarity for most of Upper Canada. Con men in the area took advantage of this situation by dressing up as priests and traveling through the hinterlands and administering sacraments- all for a nominal fee, of course. Because priestly visits were rare, and priests were often moved around, the people had no real way of telling whether or not the stranger in their parish was a real priest or not. The real priests then traveling through the region on their regular rounds would find a series of false sacraments, when the people were not ignoring the sacraments altogether, and no one was willing to pay the true priests for the same sacrament twice, false or not.

MacDonnell’s suspicions were therefore justified. So while he was polite and invited the man in, he spent much time going over O’Grady’s credentials. Perhaps it is now time we do the same, as far as is possible.

William John O’Grady's exact date of birth unknown. From his own testimony he was ordained a priest in 1816 and later served as secretary to the Bishop of Cork. From the testimony of the enemies he is about to acquire, he was fired from that position. At some point in the 1820’s he and his brother John became attached to a group of disbanded British troops who were going to settle in Brazil. What happened in Brazil is once again unknown, but whatever happened resulted in the disbanded troops and their chaplain changing their minds about settling and Brazil, and the whole lot of them rushed off to Upper Canada, with William John O’Grady in the lead. O’Grady presented himself first to Bishop MacDonnell, and offered him his services. Before the bishop could make any sort of reply or effectively go over the newcomer’s credentials, O’Grady left the bishop and made his way to York, where he offered his services to pastor MacDonnell. And here we are.

O’Grady had only been present in York a very short time when he made a request to both MacDonnell’s that St Paul’s Parish be turned over to him. Indeed, it is entirely possible he made that suggestion the very night he arrived. (If any phrase can accurately describe O’Grady, “made of brass” would be the one.) Pastor MacDonnell was eager for the help of an Irishman to aid him with his congregation. He was also wanted to leave York and head for the shores of Lake Simcoe- a real wilderness area at the time- to try and shore up the Church there, and therefore was quite amenable to the plan to hand the Parish over to O’Grady. Bishop MacDonnell also began to warm to the plan, though it was six months before the transfer was made- a delay that caused O’Grady a great amount of irritation. Patience truly is a marvelous virtue; only, not one of O'Grady's.

Pastor MacDonnell made his preparations to leave York and our little narrative, but his uncle chose not to send him to region around Lake Simcoe, but rather to Bytown, better known today as Ottawa. O’Grady, on the other hand, was rapidly consolidating his position, becoming popular with both his congregation and with the Bishop. As his on-line biography states the matter:
Once in charge of the church, O’Grady showed himself to be a man of considerable intelligence and charm who mingled easily with the grandees of York, including Lieutenant Governor Sir John Colborne*. He also proved to be an extraordinarily able and energetic priest, brimming with schemes for the advancement of Catholicism. His missionary travels took him to several townships in the vicinity of York. He constantly petitioned the government for land on which to build churches; he supervised the raising of funds for a parochial school in York and later oversaw its construction; he lobbied for financial assistance for the building of a convent; he suggested clerical conferences to control the “waywardness & impetuosity” of some priests. (Bishop) McDonell regarded O’Grady as a godsend and in January 1830 vested him with the “power and control” of a vicar general. O’Grady claimed not to wish an official appointment to this post, and indeed it was never made.
 His popularity was so great it was said many Protestants came to hear him preach. Everything appeared to be going well.

So, as we bring part one of this little history of a crisis to a close, we as yet have no crisis. In fact, everything is going swimmingly. We have an ambitious priest who is a stirring orator, a social climber and popular with all who know him, and who is gaining in power within the diocese and seems to be making converts. He was truly an answer to many prayers. What could possibly go wrong?

The answer to that question is, in a word, everything.

Next

31 May 2008

A question

June being the month dedicated to the Sacred Heart of Jesus has brought a question to mind.

According to Toronto Catholic Blog, Toronto's first bishop consecrated the diocese to the Sacred Heart of Jesus, but later when the diocese was too big for central control it was broken into deaneries, and the home deanery was named for St Michael, who is now considered our patron saint.

Shouldn't we still be under the patronage of the Sacred Heart, or am I confusing things?

22 January 2008

Some Curiosities About the Old Toronto Churches.

I was fiddling around the Internet tonight and I found a few facts I thought to be interesting. I was wondering what are the oldest Catholic Churches in Toronto, and began there.

The first parish in Toronto was St. Paul's, established in 1822. The first red brick structure (described as "Gothic" but I haven't yet found a picture of it) was opened in 1824. At the time it was the only Catholic church between Kingston and Windsor. In 1845 Toronto's first bishop Michael Power (who chose St. Michael the Archangel as the patron of the diocese) laid the cornerstone for the Cathedral. He never saw the building completed. He died October 1, 1847, after he had contracted Typhus from tending the flood of refugees from the Irish potato famine who came Toronto in the summer of '47.

Incidentally, many of those Irish immigrants died of the disease, and were buried in the graveyard at St Paul's. Around the turn of the century, the gravestones were removed and demolished, and the graveyard was turned into a schoolyard, among other things. The bodies are still there. Occasionally someone digging in the area will find one.

The next oldest church still standing is St. Basil's, which is a miniature copy of the cathedral, built in 1855. Our Lady of Lourdes comes from around 1884, St Mary's was built in 1885, and the spire was added 1904. The current St Paul's was built 1887, and is a strong contender for Toronto's most beautiful church. According to Wikipedia, St. Patrick's, built in 1908, is Toronto's fifth oldest Church. Wikipedia must not be including the Cathedral. St. Patrick's is also one of the few churches that has a Gregorian Schola. The really odd thing about St. Patrick's is that is the fifth oldest Church in the diocese that is named after St. Patrick. In a diocese which was founded mostly by the Irish, I would have expected his name to turn up much earlier than this.

So the oldest Church in Toronto would be the original St. Paul's... if it still stood. Instead it was demolished around the same time as the cemetery, as it had fallen into disuse after the construction of the new building. Which means the oldest Catholic Church in Toronto is... the Cathedral itself, unless you don't count the Cathedral as a Church, which Wikipedia does not, in which case the oldest church in Toronto is St Basil's... the cathedral in miniature.

Most of this I got from Wikipedia and the archdiocese. Some of the dates may be a little off. St. Patrick's and St. Mary's both figure prominently in the Jubilee Riots of 1875, which may mean the dates are either wrong, or there were other churches on those grounds at the time which were demolished for larger and more grand buildings. This would clear up the St Patrick problem somewhat. It also seems to me that there are other churches from the 19th century still around, unfortunately few have their own websites, so I'm having some trouble confirming this.

A few more notes. I said Bishop Power never saw the Cathedral completed. Technically, neither has anyone else. It was supposed to be a full cruciform church, but the transepts were never completed. In 1850, Toronto's second bishop, Bishop Armand François Marie de Charbonnel, P.S.S, was installed. Shortly afterwards he paid off much of the debt on the Cathedral out of his own personal estate. He also added the three great east windows and the Stations of Cross, all imported from France.

The Cathedral fell onto hard times for a while, but the building is now being restored. This creates problems which are exacerbated by the need to shut down the renovations several times a day for Mass, and also by the tendency of contractors to treat the Cathedral as an all you can eat steak buffet. Even so, it is a beautiful building and can be so again.

One last note, the current pastor at St Paul's basilica has one of the most appropriate names for a priest ever. He is Rev. Monsignor Bradley H. Massman.

Update: David sent this note on Haloscan, answering the St. Patrick's question:

Actually, the "original" St. Patrick's dates from 1867. It still stands on St. Patrick Street just north of Dundas Street directly behind the east facing St. Patrick's on McCaul Street. It is known as Our Lady of Mount Carmel and is a Chinese ethnic parish. After the "new" St. Patrick's was built (where my father was baptised and my parents married) the "old" was renamed Our Lady of Mount Carmel and given over to the Italian community. It recently underwent a quasi-restoration but not a full historical restoration.

So the the original is still around. I wonder why I found no note of it. Thanks, David.

I've done some more poking around. Most of the older churches had earlier wooden structures which were replaced as soon as the parish had the money, but it would take more digging to find dates for that. I wonder what happened in the 1880's that four parishes expanded in a big way. That could be a post for another time.

20 April 2007

Where are the singers?

I was speaking with one of my music directors lately when the two of us began speculating what happened to all the men trained at St. Michael's choir school.

The choir school was set up years ago for a few purposes. One was to train boys in singing in order to provide music for the cathedral. The other purpose was to create a body of trained liturgical musicians who would then go on to provide music for the parishes around the city.

They are successful in fulfilling the first of these purposes. They provide excellent music to accompany Mass at the Cathedral. As for the second, few parishes have a former member of the school.

The MD and I speculated some reasons. A few students go on to have careers as professional singers and make quite a name for themselves. And some do end up at the parishes, but only a few. As for the rest? I speculated that a fair number are probably sick of music by the time they graduate and never want to sing again.

But the obvious was staring me in the face, and I missed it. Those who stay in liturgical music would most likely work at a United Church, or an Anglican Church- at a church that pays. These young men are highly trained, and would want to be rewarded accordingly, but very few Catholic churches are willing to pay for such skill. One of my old parishes constantly has ads in the bulleting searching for volunteer choir leaders and "keyboardists." I don't need to add that the music situation there is a disaster.

It is sad to think that there is a pool of talent available, but we are unable to make any use of it. The other congregations who value music and are willing to pay for it, will get our best. And so the situation will stand until our Churches are willing to pay real musicians a real wage. We can train them, and they can go to the Anglicans, Episcopalians, Lutherans- anyone, really, but us.

A friend of my has a saying: "Good things ain't cheap, and cheap things ain't good." As long as we insist on getting cheap music, we will not have quality music. And we may as well stop pretending there were two reasons for the choir school.

To all the professionals who read this blog: God bless.

And tell your boss you deserve a raise.

19 February 2007

The Bishop Answers

Here is the letter sent to Bear and myself from the Most Reverend Bishop Boissonneau

Identifiers have been removed.


February 16, 2007

Dear Mr. and Mrs Bear-i-tone:

I wish to thank you for your letter of February 6, 2007 concerning Redemptionis Sacramentum and I assure you that you have fulfilled your duty in this matter.

Yours sincerely,

+ John A. Boissonneau (signed)

Most Reverend John A. Boissonneau
Chancellor of Spiritual Affairs


*******
Now, I think the Bishop just blew us off. Bear disagrees. He is willing to give the Bishop the benefit of the doubt.

I argue that inherent in his assurance that we have fulfilled our duty, is the unwritten statement of "and there is no reason to contact the Holy Father, as the above document says you can do, regarding this matter."

Bear says, "Let's wait and see."
Well Bear may be right (Yes a wife just admitted a husband can be correct -your point?) If he answered our letter on the 16th, he would not have had the chance to contact Father yet. So maybe ...... We'll see what happens at mass.

What's your take?

Click here for our letter to him

14 February 2007

Communion Cup

Well, Bear and I finally agreed that we should write to Bishop Boissonneau, Chancellor of Spiritual Affairs for the Archdiocese of Toronto, regarding the Redemptionis Sacramentum, and our pastor confectioning the Precious Blood of the Lord in a caraffe as well as a chalice. We decided to go ahead for different reasons, the most important because we feel that the Blessed Sacrament should not be abused even if it is unintentional. We waited until the Archbishop Collins was installed.

Here is the letter. All identifiers have been removed

Most Reverend Bishop John Boissonneau,
Chancellor of Spiritual Affairs
Catholic Pastoral Centre
1155 Yonge Street
Toronto, Ontario, M4T 1W2

February 6, 2007

Your Excellency,

We are writing you this letter in an effort to fulfill our duty as outlined in Redemptionis Sacramentum, as authorized by His Holiness, Pope John Paul II. In brief, our pastor, --------------, and the other priests who celebrate the Holy Mass at --------------on (street) in the City of Toronto, consecrate the wine in a flagon as well as a chalice, and then pour the Blood into several smaller chalices for communion to the faithful. As you know this is in contradiction to the Instructions in Chapter 4 [paragraph 106] of the above document from Rome, which reads:

However, the pouring of the Blood of Christ after the consecration from one vessel to another is completely to be avoided, lest anything should happen that would be to the detriment of so great a mystery. Never to be used for containing the Blood of the Lord are flagons, bowls, or other vessels that are not fully in accord with the established norms,

Also, when cleansing the chalices he pours water into one chalice, and then pours the remains of that chalice into the next chalice and so forth until the last chalice is cleansed, when he drinks it. So the Blood of Christ is poured twice, in contravention of the above instruction.

We wrote to Father ------ first, and we received the enclosed reply. We found his reply odd, for having attended several masses at the Cathedral we have never seen this practice he describes as being performed by the Cardinal. We admit we may be mistaken in this. Though at the Installation of Archbishop Thomas Collins, we
noticed that he did not use a pitcher or carafe either. He also claims that the implementation has not been promulgated by the CCCB, but both this document and the CCCB say that implementation of the instruction is entrusted to the authority of the Diocesan Bishop.

When applying the Instruction Redemptionis Sacramentum, it will be pertinent to recall the following:
……….
3. The implementation of the Instruction is entrusted to the bishop of the diocese who is the moderator, promoter, and custodian of the whole liturgical life of his diocese (cf. can. 835).


Furthermore he notes in his answer that the Extraordinary Ministers of Holy Communion carry out the cleansing of the vessels after mass in the sacristy. It is our understanding that the Indult to allow Ministers of Holy Communion to cleanse the Sacred Vessels was granted, by Pope John Paul II, to the Church in the USA, not Canada, and the Indult, having expired, was not extended, therefore the Ministers of Holy Communion, in Canada should never have been cleansing the vessels, and definitely should not be doing so still.

It is with humility, and charity that we have taken the step of writing to you. We would have left the matter alone were it not for the order given to the laity in Redemptoris Sacramentum that we too are to defend the Body and Blood from all abuses.

Chapter VIII Par.6.
[183.] In an altogether particular manner, let everyone do ll that is in their power to ensure that the Most Holy Sacrament of the Eucharist will be protected from any and every irreverence or distortion and that all abuses be thoroughly corrected. This is a most serious duty incumbent upon each and every one, and all are bound to carry it out without any favouritism


We hope this letter fulfills our duty in this matter.

God bless you and his Excellency, the Archbishop Thomas Collins.

Yours sincerely,

Puff the Magic Dragon Bear-i-tone

encl: Copies of emails to and from pastor

Copy of Voxcantor's comment

**************************************************

My E-mail to Pastor , Pastor's Response , Voxcantor's Comment
The copy of the Pastor's response did NOT include my fisking.